Difference between revisions of "Colbert Report Viewers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== WELCOME COLBERT REPORT VIEWERS == | == WELCOME COLBERT REPORT VIEWERS == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === FAQ === | ||
| + | ''This section will be expanded as it becomes apparent what our new audience wishes to know.''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Why is registration necessary?''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Conservapedia discourages anonymous contribution, preferring to lend accountability to our articles by requiring users contribute with an account, based on their real name (first name, last initial). | ||
| + | |||
=== Please comment or ask questions here: === | === Please comment or ask questions here: === | ||
Revision as of 04:45, December 9, 2009
WELCOME COLBERT REPORT VIEWERS
FAQ
This section will be expanded as it becomes apparent what our new audience wishes to know.'
Why is registration necessary?
Conservapedia discourages anonymous contribution, preferring to lend accountability to our articles by requiring users contribute with an account, based on their real name (first name, last initial).
Please comment or ask questions here:
I'll start. How are we supposed to do that when you haven't opened this page up to editing by users who aren't registered? Whoops!
Doesn't that seem needlessly insular to you? While registering is simplistic, this also seems heavily uninviting to new visitors.
- Well ultimately, we're about building an useful educational resource. Anyone who wouldn't even bother registering probably isn't really interested in making substantive contributions. --Ben Talk 23:45, 8 December 2009 (EST)
I'd forgotten how full of himself Colbert is. Unbelievable. It's a good thing O'Reilly is a rerun tonight, or I don't think I could take this.