| | :::: And this genetic similarity, this "reuse", is exactly the opposite of what we'd see if evolution were possible. If life could come from nothing, you wouldn't expect the same thing to keep coming up the same way every time. [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 12:44, 13 December 2009 (EST) | | :::: And this genetic similarity, this "reuse", is exactly the opposite of what we'd see if evolution were possible. If life could come from nothing, you wouldn't expect the same thing to keep coming up the same way every time. [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 12:44, 13 December 2009 (EST) |
| | ::::: Yes, that is one of the great contradictions of evolution. On one hand, evolutionists claim that if you ran evolutionary history again, it would be totally different, and on the other, they claim that the same things (like eyes) will keep popping up, even though this is statistically impossible. Then they fabricate things like the evolutionary history of the eye, which is entirely speculation, as none of them have any actual primitive eyes to look at. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 12:51, 13 December 2009 (EST) | | ::::: Yes, that is one of the great contradictions of evolution. On one hand, evolutionists claim that if you ran evolutionary history again, it would be totally different, and on the other, they claim that the same things (like eyes) will keep popping up, even though this is statistically impossible. Then they fabricate things like the evolutionary history of the eye, which is entirely speculation, as none of them have any actual primitive eyes to look at. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 12:51, 13 December 2009 (EST) |