Difference between revisions of "Mercury controversy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Some people in the United States say that mercury is too risky to use in [[dental filling]]s, [[vaccination]]s, or [[light bulb]]s. Others say the hazards are small enough to justify the risks.
+
Some people in the United States say that the use of [[mercury]] in [[dental filling]]s, [[vaccination]]s, or [[light bulb]]s is too dangerous to be justifiable. Others say the hazards are minor enough to justify the risks.

Revision as of 19:35, December 15, 2009

Some people in the United States say that the use of mercury in dental fillings, vaccinations, or light bulbs is too dangerous to be justifiable. Others say the hazards are minor enough to justify the risks.