Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second Epistle to the Thessalonians (Translated)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '==1.10== I note that here, [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=y1tXnrbQrjcC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=Thessalonians+1.10&source=bl&ots=DFtofmQHi1&sig=QwTQnBQ8fGYzyWSZ4Tud1vh3Vuw&hl=en...') |
m (→1.10: sig) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==1.10== | ==1.10== | ||
| − | I note that here, [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=y1tXnrbQrjcC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=Thessalonians+1.10&source=bl&ots=DFtofmQHi1&sig=QwTQnBQ8fGYzyWSZ4Tud1vh3Vuw&hl=en&ei=rigoS4PKKIiSsgOGj8y9DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CB8Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=Thessalonians%201.10&f=false there] seems to be support for one of two possible definitions of saints: The first is that of the Angels, whereas the second is that of simply very faithful believers (presumably referring to humans). I should like some guidance as to which is more appropriate. The author shows a contextual preference for "faithful" though I am not necessarily convinced by it. In any case we should not leave it as "saints" | + | I note that here, [http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=y1tXnrbQrjcC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=Thessalonians+1.10&source=bl&ots=DFtofmQHi1&sig=QwTQnBQ8fGYzyWSZ4Tud1vh3Vuw&hl=en&ei=rigoS4PKKIiSsgOGj8y9DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CB8Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=Thessalonians%201.10&f=false there] seems to be support for one of two possible definitions of saints: The first is that of the Angels, whereas the second is that of simply very faithful believers (presumably referring to humans). I should like some guidance as to which is more appropriate. The author shows a contextual preference for "faithful" though I am not necessarily convinced by it. In any case we should not leave it as "saints"--[[User:PThomson|PThomson]] 19:34, 15 December 2009 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 00:34, December 16, 2009
1.10
I note that here, there seems to be support for one of two possible definitions of saints: The first is that of the Angels, whereas the second is that of simply very faithful believers (presumably referring to humans). I should like some guidance as to which is more appropriate. The author shows a contextual preference for "faithful" though I am not necessarily convinced by it. In any case we should not leave it as "saints"--PThomson 19:34, 15 December 2009 (EST)