Difference between revisions of "Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(one case where Wikipedia got it right) |
(Richard Feynmann was clearly upset that NASA presented its clearly fantastical figures as fact) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Sorry for the delay. And I just now discovered that NASA had engaged in [[Climategate]]-style fudging: | ::Sorry for the delay. And I just now discovered that NASA had engaged in [[Climategate]]-style fudging: | ||
::*NASA management's desire to make the numbers fit ... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Commission#Role_of_Richard_Feynman] | ::*NASA management's desire to make the numbers fit ... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Commission#Role_of_Richard_Feynman] | ||
| + | ::*he was clearly upset that NASA presented its clearly fantastical figures as fact [ibid] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:33, December 18, 2009
Richard Feynmann revealed the cause to be O-rings which were not designed for a cold weather launch. Arthur Robinson said NASA engineers warned their superiors about this but were ignored. [1] How should we write about this? --Ed Poor Talk 21:52, 12 January 2008 (EST)
- Maybe we should just split the article as Wikipedia does - one half on the event, half on the event's aftermath (including the investigation). That way with the proper headings we can have an especially easy layout--IDuan 22:36, 12 January 2008 (EST)
- Sorry for the delay. And I just now discovered that NASA had engaged in Climategate-style fudging:
- NASA management's desire to make the numbers fit ... [2]
- he was clearly upset that NASA presented its clearly fantastical figures as fact [ibid]
- Sorry for the delay. And I just now discovered that NASA had engaged in Climategate-style fudging: