Difference between revisions of "Talk:Humanism"
From Conservapedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This seems simultaneously excessive and simplistic. Erasmus, for example, was both pious and humanistic. --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 22:07, 10 March 2007 (EST) | This seems simultaneously excessive and simplistic. Erasmus, for example, was both pious and humanistic. --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 22:07, 10 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm not entirely sure how to do it, but could this page be renamed "Secular Humanism" and a new article called "Humanism" or "Christian Humanism" be started? There was a movement in the Rennaisance called "Humanism" (that WOVcenter refers to in the prior comment) that wasn't atheistic, and that had major effects on European history.--[[User:Epicurius|Epicurius]] 19:55, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:55, March 29, 2007
This seems simultaneously excessive and simplistic. Erasmus, for example, was both pious and humanistic. --WOVcenter 22:07, 10 March 2007 (EST)
I'm not entirely sure how to do it, but could this page be renamed "Secular Humanism" and a new article called "Humanism" or "Christian Humanism" be started? There was a movement in the Rennaisance called "Humanism" (that WOVcenter refers to in the prior comment) that wasn't atheistic, and that had major effects on European history.--Epicurius 19:55, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
