Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
335 bytes added ,  20:17, December 26, 2009
Line 17: Line 17:     
:Good point, let's drop the non-vector definition since this term is almost always used in vector analysis.  Also, you're being overly literal in interpreting (criticizing) the rules, a characteristic I've found to be common to [[liberal style]].  Good faith, substantive edits have never been a problem on this site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:02, 26 December 2009 (EST)
 
:Good point, let's drop the non-vector definition since this term is almost always used in vector analysis.  Also, you're being overly literal in interpreting (criticizing) the rules, a characteristic I've found to be common to [[liberal style]].  Good faith, substantive edits have never been a problem on this site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:02, 26 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::I'm not interpreting the rules, I'm just observing their application. But as we are now sharing our evaluation of each others writing style, may I add that in my opinion you are somewhat to liberal in your usage of absolutes, like ''never'', or ''most logical''... [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 15:17, 26 December 2009 (EST)
256

edits

Navigation menu