Difference between revisions of "Calc3.6"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
This is an unwieldy definition, so we frequently use the equivalent statement  
 
This is an unwieldy definition, so we frequently use the equivalent statement  
  
−
<math>\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial f_3}{\partial z}</math>
+
<math>div \vec{F} = \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial f_3}{\partial z}</math>
  
−
or in two dimensions, just
+
or in two dimensions, just <math>\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial y}</math>.  Note that if we were to define a "vector" <math>\nabla = \vec{i}\partial_x +\vec{j}\partial_y + \vec{k}\partial_z </math>, we would have <math>div \vec{F} = \nabla \cdot \vec{F} </math>. Note that this isn't technically a vector, since the component are not number but differential operators, and the kind of "multiplication" we're doing isn't really multiplication, since you can't multiply an operator by a function; instead we're differentiating the components.  Nevertheless, it's a handy notational convenience, and it actually does point to a deeper truth we won't begin to address in this course, so we'll continue to use <math>\nabla \cdot \vec{F} </math> for the divergence.
−
 
 
−
<math>\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial y}</math>.
 
  
 
=The Curl=
 
=The Curl=

Revision as of 20:17, January 13, 2010

The Divergence

Definition

We've discussed partial derivatives, and we've even discussed a way to take a sort of "complete" derivative of multivariable functions (the gradient). But the gradient only works for scalar functions; how about a "complete" kind of derivative for vector fields?

In two dimensions, there is just one, but in three dimensions, there are, for reasons which won't appear until much later in your mathematical education. The first of these is called the divergence, which we investigate now.

Consider a vector field , which we interpret as representing the velocity of a fluid occupying space, or a very thin layer of flowing fluid on a plane. Suppose we wished to find out if there are any sources of fluid (like a faucet), or drains - how might we go about this?



geometric definition




Computation

This is an unwieldy definition, so we frequently use the equivalent statement

or in two dimensions, just . Note that if we were to define a "vector" , we would have . Note that this isn't technically a vector, since the component are not number but differential operators, and the kind of "multiplication" we're doing isn't really multiplication, since you can't multiply an operator by a function; instead we're differentiating the components. Nevertheless, it's a handy notational convenience, and it actually does point to a deeper truth we won't begin to address in this course, so we'll continue to use for the divergence.

The Curl

Applications of the Divergence and Curl