Changes

480 bytes added ,  03:57, January 19, 2010
no edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:  
::::::: But the question is clearly a liberal trap.  If Palin says she reads newspapers, then the follow-up question is obviously going to be "which ones"???  Then she is expected by liberals to pay homage to the New York Times or Washington Post, which would hurt her among conservatives, and she would be ridiculed by liberals if she simply listed local papers.  The whole line of questioning is "dimwitted", because it has no real value except to spark baseless criticism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:25, 17 January 2010 (EST)
 
::::::: But the question is clearly a liberal trap.  If Palin says she reads newspapers, then the follow-up question is obviously going to be "which ones"???  Then she is expected by liberals to pay homage to the New York Times or Washington Post, which would hurt her among conservatives, and she would be ridiculed by liberals if she simply listed local papers.  The whole line of questioning is "dimwitted", because it has no real value except to spark baseless criticism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:25, 17 January 2010 (EST)
 
I would like to point out that the question was ridiculous in this century.  Only the liberal elite believes newspapers and other dinosaur print media is important. It is important to them because that is how they have exercised control over the masses for 100 years. Another part of the trap is manipulating others, as Andy said, into reaffirming the liberals own high opinion of what they feel is important, ney - necessary to read.  Thank God the Internet has freed us from the liberal tyranny of telling us what we need to read about, otherwise the entire Tea Party Movement wouldn't have gotten off the ground.  Now that it has the liberals are running scared, and their shrill screaming about the "ignorant masses" (which they have always been afraid of) has reached a fever pitch! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 07:27, 18 January 2010 (EST)
 
I would like to point out that the question was ridiculous in this century.  Only the liberal elite believes newspapers and other dinosaur print media is important. It is important to them because that is how they have exercised control over the masses for 100 years. Another part of the trap is manipulating others, as Andy said, into reaffirming the liberals own high opinion of what they feel is important, ney - necessary to read.  Thank God the Internet has freed us from the liberal tyranny of telling us what we need to read about, otherwise the entire Tea Party Movement wouldn't have gotten off the ground.  Now that it has the liberals are running scared, and their shrill screaming about the "ignorant masses" (which they have always been afraid of) has reached a fever pitch! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 07:27, 18 January 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::::::::I don't understand. The question was asked because newspapers are a quick and effective way to inform oneself, not to confuse her in any way. I am often confused by political issues, but I ask questions with an open mind. Is there a better way for Mrs. Palin to inform herself? I would like Mr. Schafly to respond since he is a lawyer and must keep himself informed in some way. Perhaps his methods mirror Mrs. Palin's [[User:ElyseE|ElyseE]] 22:57, 18 January 2010 (EST)
15

edits