Difference between revisions of "Talk:Psychology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(violates guidelines)
(We need some real science here)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:Your comment violates Wikipedia guidelines on page ownership, you know. Telling someone they don't know enough about the subject to edit the article, tsk, tsk. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:54, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:Your comment violates Wikipedia guidelines on page ownership, you know. Telling someone they don't know enough about the subject to edit the article, tsk, tsk. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:54, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Materialism and pseudoscience==
 +
 +
The decision to declare the mind as nothing more than an aspect of the brain violates basic scientific principles. We ought rather to come up with ways to test the various theories about the human mind. How can we know whether the mind controls its brain, or the brain produces or controls the mind? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)

Revision as of 22:35, January 22, 2010

Ed, the content you restored is questionable at at best, and also it is a COPY AND PASTE from wikipedia. Instead of removing content that you have no expertise in work on creating new content. Tmtoulouse 12:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Your comment violates Wikipedia guidelines on page ownership, you know. Telling someone they don't know enough about the subject to edit the article, tsk, tsk. --Ed Poor 08:54, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Materialism and pseudoscience

The decision to declare the mind as nothing more than an aspect of the brain violates basic scientific principles. We ought rather to come up with ways to test the various theories about the human mind. How can we know whether the mind controls its brain, or the brain produces or controls the mind? --Ed Poor Talk 17:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)