Changes

Talk:MIT OpenCourseWare (view source)

Revision as of 21:55, January 31, 2010

244 bytes added , 21:55, January 31, 2010

You're right that the notes are merely outlines, rather than lectures. I'll make that point next. But what the notes do say about the Coase theorem is a very narrow view of it.

Line 6: Line 6:

Andy--have you read the whole set of notes? EVERYTHING pretty much gets mentioned in a "a narrow, understated manner." The notes are very obviously outlines, and not transcripts of a lecture--moreover, this is obviously an introductory/survey-level course where the goal is quite obviously to introduce studnets to the broad ideas--not to give an in-depth analysis of any one economic idea. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 16:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)

+

:You're right that the notes are merely outlines, rather than lectures. I'll make that point next. But what the notes do say about the Coase theorem is a very narrow view of it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:55, 31 January 2010 (EST)

== For a liberal course on economics... ==

...you'd figure they'd mention Keynes at least once They don't. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 16:53, 31 January 2010 (EST)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,208

edits