Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abortion genocide"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
While Pre-born has some rhetorical use after being aborted a baby is never born, so I think Unborn would be the correct word to use. I could see the difference causing confusion for someone who does not speak English well. --[[User:SamF|SamF]] 17:26, 21 January 2010 (EST)
 
While Pre-born has some rhetorical use after being aborted a baby is never born, so I think Unborn would be the correct word to use. I could see the difference causing confusion for someone who does not speak English well. --[[User:SamF|SamF]] 17:26, 21 January 2010 (EST)
  
−
Answer:
+
'''Answer:'''
−
 
 
 
Calling the live baby within the womb carries more "Weight."  "Pre-born" also connotates the posterity aspect as that life, once snuffed out, destroys any future generations coming from that life -- "Posterity."
 
Calling the live baby within the womb carries more "Weight."  "Pre-born" also connotates the posterity aspect as that life, once snuffed out, destroys any future generations coming from that life -- "Posterity."
  

Revision as of 21:36, February 2, 2010

Pre-born or Unborn?

While Pre-born has some rhetorical use after being aborted a baby is never born, so I think Unborn would be the correct word to use. I could see the difference causing confusion for someone who does not speak English well. --SamF 17:26, 21 January 2010 (EST)

Answer: Calling the live baby within the womb carries more "Weight." "Pre-born" also connotates the posterity aspect as that life, once snuffed out, destroys any future generations coming from that life -- "Posterity."

The pro life movement needs to alter its terminology. For instance, calling pro-choice people, either / or, pro-death or pro-abortion. Reality must be the order of the day when writing and / or describing abortion and abortion genocide.

Thank you. NathanBickel - User -- still working on Conservapedia's formatting......