Difference between revisions of "Talk:Andromeda galaxy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Disclaimer) |
(Final and last warning) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Perhaps at the top of each astronomy article we can put a disclaimer like "This article assumes a universe that is approximately 13,7 billion years old. This is just a theory and in no way has been proven." That way we can keep in the science. [[User:DaneW|DaneW]] 00:15, 11 February 2010 (EST) | Perhaps at the top of each astronomy article we can put a disclaimer like "This article assumes a universe that is approximately 13,7 billion years old. This is just a theory and in no way has been proven." That way we can keep in the science. [[User:DaneW|DaneW]] 00:15, 11 February 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :How about you actually read the comment I left the other day on your talk page? I find you deceitful, stating one purpose for being here, and editing everything but. Did you follow the links to the other pages linked to the Commandments? The are adjunct to them, as clearly stated on their page. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:32, 11 February 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:32, February 11, 2010
Disclaimer
Perhaps at the top of each astronomy article we can put a disclaimer like "This article assumes a universe that is approximately 13,7 billion years old. This is just a theory and in no way has been proven." That way we can keep in the science. DaneW 00:15, 11 February 2010 (EST)
- How about you actually read the comment I left the other day on your talk page? I find you deceitful, stating one purpose for being here, and editing everything but. Did you follow the links to the other pages linked to the Commandments? The are adjunct to them, as clearly stated on their page. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 00:32, 11 February 2010 (EST)