Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Liberal Inability To Abstract (view source)

Revision as of 00:52, February 12, 2010

509 bytes added ,  00:52, February 12, 2010
When a liberal denies the existence of something that is unseen, it can be helpful to inquire if it is possible that the five senses are limited and cannot experience all that exists.
Line 46: Line 46:     
When discussing one of the above issues with a liberal, '''first consider whether the liberal is capable of understanding the abstraction'''.  If not, then your main challenge may be in explaining the abstraction as clearly as possible.
 
When discussing one of the above issues with a liberal, '''first consider whether the liberal is capable of understanding the abstraction'''.  If not, then your main challenge may be in explaining the abstraction as clearly as possible.
 +
 +
When a liberal denies the existence of something that is unseen, it can be helpful to inquire if it is possible that the five senses are limited and cannot experience all that exists.  Once he admits the truth of that statement, then he can begin the process of abstraction to learn the truth and see the flaws in many liberal arguments designed for those who are unwilling or unable to abstract.
 +
 +
== Example:  Hell ==
 +
 +
Is there any logical difficulty to experiencing Hell once the five senses stop working?
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,208

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/753620"

Navigation menu