Difference between revisions of "User talk:JeffT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (better link for warning, for the "fine young cannibal" - oops, broke my own rule!) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
See also [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Young_mass_murderers&diff=754842&oldid=754820 this warning]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:07, 16 February 2010 (EST) | See also [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Young_mass_murderers&diff=754842&oldid=754820 this warning]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:07, 16 February 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | :Ed, my remarks were utterly impersonal. '''Everyone''' should agree that '''anyone''' who intentionally misrepresents facts is being deceitful. And it is very difficult to distinguish between debating and working on articles because rigorous explanations are demanded for factual changes. If I came off as offensive, I apologize for that. It was not my intention. My intention was to improve the factual accuracy of the article. Thanks, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 16:12, 16 February 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:12, February 16, 2010
Lifelong Catholic. Hardcore conservative.
I will fight for factual accuracy even if it is unappreciated or gets me kicked out of here.
Factual accuracy is good, and will be appreciated but making personal remarks will get you kicked out. Also, try to distinguish between debating and working on articles. If you have an idea to improve an article, propose it in a humble way, rather than in an overbearing or offensive way. It's not what you say, it's how you say it.
See also this warning. --Ed Poor Talk 12:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)
- Ed, my remarks were utterly impersonal. Everyone should agree that anyone who intentionally misrepresents facts is being deceitful. And it is very difficult to distinguish between debating and working on articles because rigorous explanations are demanded for factual changes. If I came off as offensive, I apologize for that. It was not my intention. My intention was to improve the factual accuracy of the article. Thanks, JeffT 16:12, 16 February 2010 (EST)