Difference between revisions of "Talk:John 15-21 (Translated)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Well, it makes perfect sense for Christians to believe that Jesus, the Son of God, would have known about the modern-day political meaning of "right" and "left" 18 centuries before; so from a Christian point of view this objection is not valid. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 14:41, 27 February 2010 (EST) | : Well, it makes perfect sense for Christians to believe that Jesus, the Son of God, would have known about the modern-day political meaning of "right" and "left" 18 centuries before; so from a Christian point of view this objection is not valid. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 14:41, 27 February 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I'll add the non-political translation: follow my instructions is correct (right) or Jesus leads him to the '''right'''eous way, to success. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:13, 27 February 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:13, February 27, 2010
Reversion explained
First, we don't censor ideas here. Second, the edit comment did not justify the censorship.
Discuss rather than censor.--Andy Schlafly 14:31, 27 February 2010 (EST)
- Well, it makes perfect sense for Christians to believe that Jesus, the Son of God, would have known about the modern-day political meaning of "right" and "left" 18 centuries before; so from a Christian point of view this objection is not valid. --Maquissar 14:41, 27 February 2010 (EST)
- I'll add the non-political translation: follow my instructions is correct (right) or Jesus leads him to the righteous way, to success. --Jpatt 15:13, 27 February 2010 (EST)