Difference between revisions of "Mercury controversy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(adding category to uncategorized page)
m (Corrected misdirected link)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Some people in the United States say that the use of [[mercury]] in [[dental filling]]s, [[vaccination]]s, or [[light bulb]]s is too dangerous to be justifiable. Others say the hazards are minor enough to justify the risks.
+
Some people in the United States say that the use of [[Mercury (element)|mercury]] in [[dental filling]]s, [[vaccination]]s, or [[light bulb]]s is too dangerous to be justifiable. Others say the hazards are minor enough to justify the risks.
  
 
[[Category:Health]]
 
[[Category:Health]]

Latest revision as of 15:54, March 1, 2010

Some people in the United States say that the use of mercury in dental fillings, vaccinations, or light bulbs is too dangerous to be justifiable. Others say the hazards are minor enough to justify the risks.