Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal Democrats"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Thanks Robert and Marianne...perhaps we could keep the accurate information but without trying to rationalize their meaning? --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:31, 18 March 2010 (EDT) | :Thanks Robert and Marianne...perhaps we could keep the accurate information but without trying to rationalize their meaning? --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:31, 18 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Absolutely. The Liberal Democrats are a nasty bunch, even worse because of the "nice" image they have striven to convey over the years. I will try to find examples of some of their unsavoury practices to add. [[User:RobertE|RobertE]] 14:34, 18 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:34, March 18, 2010
Undo Explanation
The previous version had several inaccuracies. Most glaring was the claim that all British political parties want the EU to take the lead on Global Warming. The UK Independence Party (for one) would take exception to that! RobertE 14:22, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks Robert and Marianne...perhaps we could keep the accurate information but without trying to rationalize their meaning? --ṬK/Admin/Talk 14:31, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
- Absolutely. The Liberal Democrats are a nasty bunch, even worse because of the "nice" image they have striven to convey over the years. I will try to find examples of some of their unsavoury practices to add. RobertE 14:34, 18 March 2010 (EDT)