Difference between revisions of "Talk:C++"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(right on the money) |
(right on the money) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Good edit: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=C%2B%2B&curid=52007&diff=764149&oldid=534585&rcid=839068 "powerful but cryptic"] is an opinion, and doesn't belong so close to the beginning of the article. We need a comments section for that: what have various prominent users of C++ said about the language? How does it compare to alternatives like [[Java]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17: | + | Good edit: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=C%2B%2B&curid=52007&diff=764149&oldid=534585&rcid=839068 "powerful but cryptic"] is an opinion, and doesn't belong so close to the beginning of the article. We need a comments section for that: what have various prominent users of C++ said about the language? How does it compare to alternatives like [[Java]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:44, 21 March 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 21:44, March 21, 2010
Good edit: "powerful but cryptic" is an opinion, and doesn't belong so close to the beginning of the article. We need a comments section for that: what have various prominent users of C++ said about the language? How does it compare to alternatives like Java? --Ed Poor Talk 17:44, 21 March 2010 (EDT)