Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open source (software)"

Revision as of 03:45, March 31, 2007

I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. --Jack 19:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. Tmtoulouse 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.

OSI > GNU, lolz Jaques 23:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:15, March 30, 2007 (view source) Tim.thelion (talk \| contribs) (OSI) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:45, March 31, 2007 (view source) Jaques (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.		I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.
		+	:OSI > GNU, lolz [[User:Jaques\|Jaques]] 23:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)