Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Street One blog"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RichardKerry (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Encyclopedic == | == Encyclopedic == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
:I tend to agree. I will be asking Mr. Schlafly and other Admins to check this out. Thanks for asking about this! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:04, 16 April 2010 (EDT) | :I tend to agree. I will be asking Mr. Schlafly and other Admins to check this out. Thanks for asking about this! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:04, 16 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::My pleasure. Mr Welch, I meant no offense by my comment, I am sure your blog is very good, I was just concerned about its place on an encyclopedia. [[User:RichardKerry|RichardKerry]] 16:47, 16 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:47, April 16, 2010
Encyclopedic
How encyclopedic is this? No offence, but this seems to be slightly self-promoting. RichardKerry 10:31, 16 April 2010 (EDT)
- I tend to agree. I will be asking Mr. Schlafly and other Admins to check this out. Thanks for asking about this! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 12:04, 16 April 2010 (EDT)
- My pleasure. Mr Welch, I meant no offense by my comment, I am sure your blog is very good, I was just concerned about its place on an encyclopedia. RichardKerry 16:47, 16 April 2010 (EDT)