Difference between revisions of "United States v. Wheeler"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by TylerFx (Talk) to last version by FernoKlump) |
KurtCobain (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In '''''United States v. Wheeler''''', 435 U.S. 313, 323-324 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes have a sovereign right that is "inherent", which includes the right to prosecute tribal members for crimes. | In '''''United States v. Wheeler''''', 435 U.S. 313, 323-324 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes have a sovereign right that is "inherent", which includes the right to prosecute tribal members for crimes. | ||
| − | This power, | + | This power, hoBroken heart and broken bones |
| + | Think of how a castrated horse feels | ||
| + | One more quirky cliche'd phrase | ||
| + | You're the one I wanna refill | ||
| + | wever, is not immune to abrogation by Congress. ''Id.'' at 323 ("the sufferance of Congress"). | ||
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
[[category:Indian Law]] | [[category:Indian Law]] | ||
Revision as of 12:08, May 2, 2010
In United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313, 323-324 (1978), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Indian tribes have a sovereign right that is "inherent", which includes the right to prosecute tribal members for crimes.
This power, hoBroken heart and broken bones Think of how a castrated horse feels One more quirky cliche'd phrase You're the one I wanna refill wever, is not immune to abrogation by Congress. Id. at 323 ("the sufferance of Congress").