Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cramer's rule"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (correct user link) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I don't know why [[User:Sam Becker]] didn't simply log in and post this himself. If it's his own work, I'd like him to get the credit. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:52, 7 May 2010 (EDT) | + | I don't know why [[User:SamHB|Sam Becker]] didn't simply log in and post this himself. If it's his own work, I'd like him to get the credit. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:52, 7 May 2010 (EDT) |
:That's a good question. The user resigned, according to his block reason, and it is stated in his block his account would be re-activated upon request. Nevertheless, his contributions are welcome! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 23:54, 7 May 2010 (EDT) | :That's a good question. The user resigned, according to his block reason, and it is stated in his block his account would be re-activated upon request. Nevertheless, his contributions are welcome! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 23:54, 7 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:54, May 8, 2010
I don't know why Sam Becker didn't simply log in and post this himself. If it's his own work, I'd like him to get the credit. --Ed Poor Talk 23:52, 7 May 2010 (EDT)
- That's a good question. The user resigned, according to his block reason, and it is stated in his block his account would be re-activated upon request. Nevertheless, his contributions are welcome! JacobB 23:54, 7 May 2010 (EDT)