Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Civility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Civility appears to be a catch-all word thrown around by Ed Poor when he wants to block people that have not violated Conservapedia Commandments. --[[User:Huey dun gotcha|Huey dun gotcha]] 16:07, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | Civility appears to be a catch-all word thrown around by Ed Poor when he wants to block people that have not violated Conservapedia Commandments. --[[User:Huey dun gotcha|Huey dun gotcha]] 16:07, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now, now.... | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It's kind of like the word "friend". It's a fine word as it is, but only rarely when used in the second person singular does it actually mean what it's supposed to mean and usually means the exact opposite. [[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 16:10, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:10, March 31, 2007
What is civility?
Is it "civil" to tell someone to be civil?
Isn't it condescending to do this?
Civility appears to be a catch-all word thrown around by Ed Poor when he wants to block people that have not violated Conservapedia Commandments. --Huey dun gotcha 16:07, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
Now, now....