Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is the Iraq War a success?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Was a personal attack)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
The entire "War on Terror" is a farce meant to advance the conservative agenda and enrich the political leaders who started it.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 15:09, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
 
The entire "War on Terror" is a farce meant to advance the conservative agenda and enrich the political leaders who started it.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 15:09, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Rebiu, Rebiu, Rebiu...Your conspiracy theories are as useless as your liberal agenda. Do you realize, my ignorant friend, that the "War on Terror" is meant to prevent further attacks on American soil? And Rebiu, do you realize that prominent liberal leaders such as Hillary Clinton approved a war in Iraq? Is Hillary being "enriched" by the war, as you so eloquently stated? Addressing this conservative agenda you spoke of; does this include prayer in schools and making abortion illegal? Rebiu, this war has nothing to do with the conservative agenda. The media has brainwashed you, Rebiu, to a point that you have no ability to reason. You cannot see that the war in Iraq is for your own protection. You are instead blinded by insecurity, ignorance, and liberal anti-Americanism. You might consider asking your parent's permission before the next time you log on to spew more liberal nonsense. Have a lovely day worrying about the conservative agenda. The conservatives are probably stealing money from you as we speak. Oh my gosh, they just set up a lookout across the street!!!
 
  
 
== Yes ==
 
== Yes ==

Revision as of 20:18, March 31, 2007

! THIS IS A DEBATE PAGE, NOT AN ARTICLE. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Conservapedia.
Your opinion is welcome! Please remember to sign your comments on this page, and refrain from editing other user's contributions.
New Users: Please read our "Editing etiquette" before posting 		Conservlogo.png

No

We lose dozens of troops a month, there are bombings every day, over 60,000 Iraqi civilians are dead, a brutal dictator has been replaced by fantatical warring factions, and nothing seems to be changing (we've lost a higher percentace of US troops in 2007 than in any other year since the invasion (www.icasualties.org)). The rebuilding of the infastructure has failed, the US military is stretched to the limits, and it's unpopular at home (www.pollingreport.com). I say bring the boys (and girls) home! Czolgolz 11:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

It was never going to be a successful war. I doubt even calling it a war. The US is a utter failure when it comes to nation building. Always remember that a government never goes to war for the reasons that they state. "Liberating the people of Iraq" is just a philanthropy. There are more real reasons to go to war with Iraq. A US controlled Iraq provides a stable source of oil for the US and more importantly, can act as a valuable staging point for a bigger war with Iran. Its much easier to keep the supply lines from Iraq to Iran than from the US to Iran.--Elamdri 12:12, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

The entire "War on Terror" is a farce meant to advance the conservative agenda and enrich the political leaders who started it.Rebiu 15:09, 30 March 2007 (EDT)


Yes

Well, it's not going to be easy - but we've got rid of a dictator.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 14:28, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
There are worse things than a dictator as this war has shownRebiu 15:11, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

One dictator down...and...what? two or three dozen to go? Czolgolz 23:05, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

You have to start somewhere. If you don't begin you can never finish.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 05:52, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
At this rate America and with this leadership I doubt America could survive to the finishRebiu 09:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F&oldid=77776"