Difference between revisions of "Talk:McDonaldization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==THIS IS A GOOD ARTICLE==
 +
IT SHOWS CONSERVATIVES HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR NOT FOUND IN GODLESS ATHEISTS. -THEVOICEOFREASON (ALSO, DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO STOP WRITING IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS?)
 +
 
Sez who? [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 11:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT) , ''longing for a citation.''
 
Sez who? [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 11:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT) , ''longing for a citation.''
 
:I agree, this is someone's made up term. Someone should mark for deletion.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 17:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:I agree, this is someone's made up term. Someone should mark for deletion.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 17:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:56, May 15, 2010

THIS IS A GOOD ARTICLE

IT SHOWS CONSERVATIVES HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR NOT FOUND IN GODLESS ATHEISTS. -THEVOICEOFREASON (ALSO, DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO STOP WRITING IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS?)

Sez who? Aziraphale 11:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT) , longing for a citation.

I agree, this is someone's made up term. Someone should mark for deletion.--Elamdri 17:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Heard of it before. My dad and i were talking economics and he told me a lil bit about it. Ever heard of de-Stalinazation? --Will N. 17:03, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

It is still a slang term and we shouldn't encourage people to throw it around like it's a real word.--Elamdri 17:11, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
I suppose my point, which I didn't make clear (sowwies!) is: no citation, no real explanation, no history. There are stubs, and then there are STUBS like this one. Whoever is passionate about this article existing should really get in here and make something out of it. However, based on the Admin's "encyclopedia" test as used elsewhere, it seems to me this doesn't really belong. Aziraphale 11:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)