Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedophilic priests"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I do agree that the topic is noteworthy. One of the reasons I deleted it was because the word "pedophilic" was misspelled. I suppose I could have moved it. ~~~~)
 
(yuk! sad but true)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I do agree that the topic is noteworthy. One of the reasons I deleted it was because the word "pedophilic" was misspelled. I suppose I could have moved it. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:12, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I do agree that the topic is noteworthy. One of the reasons I deleted it was because the word "pedophilic" was misspelled. I suppose I could have moved it. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:12, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I personally met one of these men. He was removed from his leadership position but retained his 'priesthood' and entered treatment. There are 12-step groups for [[sexual addiction]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:20, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:20, April 1, 2007

I do agree that the topic is noteworthy. One of the reasons I deleted it was because the word "pedophilic" was misspelled. I suppose I could have moved it. MountainDew 20:12, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

I personally met one of these men. He was removed from his leadership position but retained his 'priesthood' and entered treatment. There are 12-step groups for sexual addiction. --Ed Poor 20:20, 31 March 2007 (EDT)