nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + Line 15:
Line 17: +
In defence of AiG
:: I'm backing AmesG on this one, AiG is shady and should be avoided as a reference. On their "about us" page they say: "When properly understood, the “evidence” confirms the biblical account." That's a convienent way of saying, if it doesn't agree with the bible then the evidence is wrong and we're right. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 11:25, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:: I'm backing AmesG on this one, AiG is shady and should be avoided as a reference. On their "about us" page they say: "When properly understood, the “evidence” confirms the biblical account." That's a convienent way of saying, if it doesn't agree with the bible then the evidence is wrong and we're right. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 11:25, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
What utter rubbish from AmesG and Jrssr5. It presents a worldview that they are ideologically opposed to, so they try and dismiss it with unsubstantiated slander and twisting what they say. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:11, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
: Only Genesis. No evil-ution. They're that nuts.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
: Only Genesis. No evil-ution. They're that nuts.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
::A citation? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
::A citation? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
:::He can't give one because that is not what they believe. He is criticising them with a straw-man argument of his own invention (although I'll admit that it may not be intentional; he might be so ideologically opposed to them that he actually believes his straw-man argument to be true). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:11, 1 April 2007 (EDT)