nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 192:
Line 192: + +
→Missing Footnote
::::I don't understand. I saw what looked like an excellent paragraph in the article, but there was no footnote in the paragraph, and it obviously needs one. So I asked if the footnote had gotten lost. I didn't make any changes to the Arkansas paragraph. I don't understand how the adjective egregious got into this. I thought I would help by fixing a couple of mechanical/grammatical slips. ([[User:Thunkful|Thunkful]] 00:32, 17 June 2010 (EDT))
::::I don't understand. I saw what looked like an excellent paragraph in the article, but there was no footnote in the paragraph, and it obviously needs one. So I asked if the footnote had gotten lost. I didn't make any changes to the Arkansas paragraph. I don't understand how the adjective egregious got into this. I thought I would help by fixing a couple of mechanical/grammatical slips. ([[User:Thunkful|Thunkful]] 00:32, 17 June 2010 (EDT))
:::::You're over-thinking this....I just pointed out that you are an editor here, the article wasn't locked, and your suggestions were respectful and there wasn't a need for your posts to be reverted here, is all. Carry on. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:38, 17 June 2010 (EDT)