Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
falsifiability and the ACLU
Line 21: Line 21:     
No.  See the article on falsifiability at my talk page.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
No.  See the article on falsifiability at my talk page.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Very disingenuous.  Of course I saw it&mdash;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG/Archive_1 I refuted much of it].  But you removed my refutation to an archive, and ignored (assuming you saw it) my [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:AmesG&diff=62237&oldid=62179 edit comment] pointing out you had ignored the refutation and simply repeated the incorrect information.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
 
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
Line 36: Line 38:     
Have you read the ACLU article?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Have you read the ACLU article?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I hadn't, but a quick look at it now, and I don't know what point about it you are referring to.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu