Difference between revisions of "Ernst and Ernst v. Hochfelder"

Revision as of 22:21, June 28, 2010

tsk, another unreferenced article...i thought you had some commandment about sourcing stuff? or is being correct to much like wikipedia?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-In '''''Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder''''', 425 U.S. 185 (1976), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that to establish liability under the [[securities]] laws, § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, a private [[plaintiff]] must prove that the defendant acted with scienter, "a mental state embracing intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud." ''Id.'' at 193-194, and n. 12.  The Court reversed a judgment based on evidence that lacked this proof.
+tsk, another unreferenced article...i thought you had some commandment about sourcing stuff? or is being correct to much like wikipedia?
-Justices [[Harry Blackmun]] and [[William Brennan]] dissented.
-[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]