Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Perpetual motion machine (view source)

Revision as of 04:53, January 2, 2007

400 bytes added ,  04:53, January 2, 2007
no edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:     
Now that's an interesting question that is difficult to answer fully!  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:05, 1 January 2007 (EST)
 
Now that's an interesting question that is difficult to answer fully!  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:05, 1 January 2007 (EST)
−
  −
      
Theoretically it is possible (the first law of motion), but practically it is impossible just because you wouldn't be able to eliminate all outside forces.  
 
Theoretically it is possible (the first law of motion), but practically it is impossible just because you wouldn't be able to eliminate all outside forces.  
Line 48: Line 46:     
[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]]
 
[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]]
 +
 +
So, Ben, you seem to be saying that a "perpetual motion machine II" (as defined above) may be possible to build.
 +
 +
Really think so?  If you doubt it, then maybe you can discovery a way to prove it is impossible.  I don't think anyone has proven that yet, and no one else seems to be trying at this time either.  But it would be worth proving.
 +
--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:53, 1 January 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,891

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/7916"

Navigation menu