Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ku Klux Klan"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Facts are, the Democratic party still controls the South at all levels of government, and any so-called "re-alingnment" was fictional or imaginary. But you get an "E" for "effort", putting Reagan's name on the KKK page. And the claim "the Klan bears no connection with any modern mainstream political party", we would have to actually ask Klansman what thier party preference is for this claim to be valid; anyone willing to wager what the result would be? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | Facts are, the Democratic party still controls the South at all levels of government, and any so-called "re-alingnment" was fictional or imaginary. But you get an "E" for "effort", putting Reagan's name on the KKK page. And the claim "the Klan bears no connection with any modern mainstream political party", we would have to actually ask Klansman what thier party preference is for this claim to be valid; anyone willing to wager what the result would be? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | Well, Rob, you could ask David Duke, who served as the chairman of the Tammany Parish Republican party for a while | + | Well, Rob, you could ask David Duke, who served as the chairman of the Tammany Parish Republican party for a while. |
Sorry, but the GOP's Southern Strategy is no fantasy, as anyone old enough to remember the '60s and '70s will tell you. | Sorry, but the GOP's Southern Strategy is no fantasy, as anyone old enough to remember the '60s and '70s will tell you. | ||
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 17:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 17:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:09, April 1, 2007
BY any reasonable standards, the KKK are terrorists.
Dunno...don't terrorists actually, you know...DO stuff? The think about the klan is they're not a centralized organization...just a lot of tiny splinter groups...they're no longer the powerful machine they were in the twenties. Czolgolz 09:34, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Democratic link
I explained it in context. If the context is removed, so must be the link.-AmesGyo! 16:31, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
More fantasy
I think this is pure fantasy:
- Prior to the Reagan Realignment, the Democratic Party was the party of the South - it overwhelmingly controlled the South. Especially prior to Strom Thurmond's "Dixiecrat" splinter movement, the Democratic Party was responsible for a good deal of racist legislation, and was perceived to be connected to the Klan. However, such a causal connection is over fifty years old and the Klan bears no connection with any modern mainstream political party.
Facts are, the Democratic party still controls the South at all levels of government, and any so-called "re-alingnment" was fictional or imaginary. But you get an "E" for "effort", putting Reagan's name on the KKK page. And the claim "the Klan bears no connection with any modern mainstream political party", we would have to actually ask Klansman what thier party preference is for this claim to be valid; anyone willing to wager what the result would be? RobS 17:06, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
Well, Rob, you could ask David Duke, who served as the chairman of the Tammany Parish Republican party for a while.
Sorry, but the GOP's Southern Strategy is no fantasy, as anyone old enough to remember the '60s and '70s will tell you. --PF Fox 17:08, 1 April 2007 (EDT)