Difference between revisions of "General theory of evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''general theory of evolution''' says that, " | + | The '''general theory of evolution''' says that, "all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form." |
<ref>This ‘General Theory of Evolution’ (GTE) was defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.’ -- Kerkut, G.A., ''Implications of Evolution'', Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960. He continued: ‘the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.’ [http://creation.com/whos-really-pushing-bad-science-rebuttal-to-lawrence-s-lerner#r1 Creation Ministries International]</ref> | <ref>This ‘General Theory of Evolution’ (GTE) was defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.’ -- Kerkut, G.A., ''Implications of Evolution'', Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960. He continued: ‘the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.’ [http://creation.com/whos-really-pushing-bad-science-rebuttal-to-lawrence-s-lerner#r1 Creation Ministries International]</ref> | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 19:21, July 30, 2010
The general theory of evolution says that, "all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form." [1]
Notes
- ↑ This ‘General Theory of Evolution’ (GTE) was defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.’ -- Kerkut, G.A., Implications of Evolution, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960. He continued: ‘the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.’ Creation Ministries International