Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gregor Mendel"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(unsigned and reply)
(Was he a Creationist?)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 
: Because nobody has added it yet?  Here's your chance!  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 
: Because nobody has added it yet?  Here's your chance!  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
Was he a Creationist, as creation.com suggests? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:29, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 19:29, July 30, 2010

The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mcpannier (talk)

How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--Snotbowst 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Because nobody has added it yet? Here's your chance! Philip J. Rayment 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Was he a Creationist, as creation.com suggests? --Ed Poor Talk 15:29, 30 July 2010 (EDT)