Changes

Line 195: Line 195:     
:::::::Here's a good source: [http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/1996/Vol%2028_16.pdf | US Navy].  As for engineers not bothering to learn relativity, I think that's a mite off the mark.  I'm an engineer and I had to take a class dealing with the basics of SR, and I'm just an electrical engineer.  Aerospace engineers certainly deal with relativity a great deal, as do nuclear engineers. [[User:DanieleGiusto|DanieleGiusto]] 00:26, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
 
:::::::Here's a good source: [http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/1996/Vol%2028_16.pdf | US Navy].  As for engineers not bothering to learn relativity, I think that's a mite off the mark.  I'm an engineer and I had to take a class dealing with the basics of SR, and I'm just an electrical engineer.  Aerospace engineers certainly deal with relativity a great deal, as do nuclear engineers. [[User:DanieleGiusto|DanieleGiusto]] 00:26, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::::Bah...  My engineering professor worked at a synchrotron at Brookhaven National Laboratory.  He was in charge of a beam line for the Naval Research Laboratory.  They are actually very interesting devices in that they really help with all fields of science and even fields outside of it.  My one friend conducted some research with a synchrotron when doing research with fuel cells.  My engineering professor studied magnetic materials with a synchrotron.  Every once in a while you also find stories like this http://news.discovery.com/human/brain-human-ancestor-skull.html which actually wouldn't have been possible without the synchrotron.  I'm only just scratching the surface of how useful they are.  Would you like some more information?  [[User:AdamYak|AdamYak]] 14:35, 10 August 2010 (EDT)
    
Are not the atomic bomb and nuclear power examples of inventions based on the equivalence of matter and energy?  MLS 9 Aug 10
 
Are not the atomic bomb and nuclear power examples of inventions based on the equivalence of matter and energy?  MLS 9 Aug 10
2

edits