Difference between revisions of "Talk:Counterexamples to the Bible"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Doesn't this become tautological if you are unwilling to consider counterexamples? [[User:TylerGD|TylerGD]] 10:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
 
Doesn't this become tautological if you are unwilling to consider counterexamples? [[User:TylerGD|TylerGD]] 10:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
:The "counterexamples" you posted were repeatedly brought up over the years by atheists, agnostics, and the generally dimwitted over the course of thousands of years; and these "counterexamples" were repeatedly proven wrong.  That's "Proven" with a capitol "P". [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:27, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:27, August 11, 2010

No counterexamples to the Bible?

Doesn't this become tautological if you are unwilling to consider counterexamples? TylerGD 10:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

The "counterexamples" you posted were repeatedly brought up over the years by atheists, agnostics, and the generally dimwitted over the course of thousands of years; and these "counterexamples" were repeatedly proven wrong. That's "Proven" with a capitol "P". Karajou 10:27, 11 August 2010 (EDT)