Difference between revisions of "Talk:Counterexamples to the Bible"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::Ok, I understand this necessity. I agree that only the MAJOR counterexamples should be addressed! Thank you, anyway, for posting the link to the edits. --[[User:MarcoT2|MarcoT2]] 12:01, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ::::Ok, I understand this necessity. I agree that only the MAJOR counterexamples should be addressed! Thank you, anyway, for posting the link to the edits. --[[User:MarcoT2|MarcoT2]] 12:01, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::::What should happen is a separate article titled [[Alleged Biblical contradictions]], detailing the passages, what liberals have against them, and why the contradictions don't exist in the first place. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:05, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | + | :::::What should happen is a separate article titled [[Alleged Biblical contradictions]], detailing the passages, what liberals have against them, and why the contradictions don't exist in the first place. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:05, 11 August 2010 (EDT |
| + | |||
| + | How about the First Law of Thermodynamics? This states that energy may not be created or destroyed, which contradicts Genesis. | ||
| + | Also, the creation story says that light was created first. Light is not possible without a spacetime manifold, which was not created at that time. | ||
| + | The population of the earth is much too large too soon after the flood. Assuming 8 humans survived the flood, every woman over 15 years old would have to have 50 children to produce a large enough population by the time of the Exodus from Egypt. (Assuming: the flood was in the year 3000 BC, and the Exodus was in 2500 BC). And, even assuming this is possible, it does nothing to address the sudden rise of different races. | ||
Revision as of 23:52, August 11, 2010
No counterexamples to the Bible?
Doesn't this become tautological if you are unwilling to consider counterexamples? TylerGD 10:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- The "counterexamples" you posted were repeatedly brought up over the years by atheists, agnostics, and the generally dimwitted over the course of thousands of years; and these "counterexamples" were repeatedly proven wrong. That's "Proven" with a capitol "P". Karajou 10:27, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- Sorry, I must have missed something. Which counterexamples did TylerGD post? If they have all been Proven wrong with a capital P, shouldn't this article address them and state why they are wrong, as with every other counterexample here, instead of just not considering them? --MarcoT2 11:48, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- The page history contains the edits here. I found the alleged "counterexamples" to be remarkably trivial and non-substantive. Our entries here are substantive, and will remain so.--Andy Schlafly 11:59, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- Ok, I understand this necessity. I agree that only the MAJOR counterexamples should be addressed! Thank you, anyway, for posting the link to the edits. --MarcoT2 12:01, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- What should happen is a separate article titled Alleged Biblical contradictions, detailing the passages, what liberals have against them, and why the contradictions don't exist in the first place. Karajou 12:05, 11 August 2010 (EDT
How about the First Law of Thermodynamics? This states that energy may not be created or destroyed, which contradicts Genesis. Also, the creation story says that light was created first. Light is not possible without a spacetime manifold, which was not created at that time. The population of the earth is much too large too soon after the flood. Assuming 8 humans survived the flood, every woman over 15 years old would have to have 50 children to produce a large enough population by the time of the Exodus from Egypt. (Assuming: the flood was in the year 3000 BC, and the Exodus was in 2500 BC). And, even assuming this is possible, it does nothing to address the sudden rise of different races.