Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canberra"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canberra&diff=prev&oldid=814070] That edit was not cited, and no source on Google agrees that they '''"happen frequently"''' as the …') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canberra&diff=prev&oldid=814070] That edit was not cited, and no source on Google agrees that they '''"happen frequently"''' as the ''known vandal-site saboteur stated''. Yes indeed, we are always watching. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:40, 27 August 2010 (EDT) | + | [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canberra&diff=prev&oldid=814070] That edit was not cited, and no source on Google agrees that they '''"happen frequently"''' as the ''known vandal-site saboteur stated''. Yes indeed, we are always watching. Good thing I bothered to check several of the vandals edits before blocking him, eh? Mixed in among good edits were some of pure poppycock, like the one here. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:40, 27 August 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 21:57, August 27, 2010
[1] That edit was not cited, and no source on Google agrees that they "happen frequently" as the known vandal-site saboteur stated. Yes indeed, we are always watching. Good thing I bothered to check several of the vandals edits before blocking him, eh? Mixed in among good edits were some of pure poppycock, like the one here. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 16:40, 27 August 2010 (EDT)