Difference between revisions of "Talk:Devils Tower"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Article improperly titled - needs to be changed/moved) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There is actually no apostrophe used in the name of the rock due to a never corrected clerical error. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 10:55, 27 May 2008 (EDT) | There is actually no apostrophe used in the name of the rock due to a never corrected clerical error. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 10:55, 27 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:17, 27 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Formation == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Though the USGS shows no extrusive igneous activity in the immediate area, the reference also states that "Missouri Buttes, about 4 miles to the northwest, and the Tower have the same composition so it is assumed that they were derived from a common magma; possibly the magma of a large intrusive body, such as a laccolith or sill." [[User:ColinS|ColinS]] 16:10, 29 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:10, August 29, 2010
Article improperly titled - needs to be changed/moved
There is actually no apostrophe used in the name of the rock due to a never corrected clerical error. Jinxmchue 10:55, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks. Jinxmchue 15:17, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
Formation
Though the USGS shows no extrusive igneous activity in the immediate area, the reference also states that "Missouri Buttes, about 4 miles to the northwest, and the Tower have the same composition so it is assumed that they were derived from a common magma; possibly the magma of a large intrusive body, such as a laccolith or sill." ColinS 16:10, 29 August 2010 (EDT)