Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wasilla, Alaska"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:As an admin, TK is more than qualified to judge what constitutes plagiarism, particuarly compared to a user with a dozen edits. As a former admin, I would instruct you to drop this immediately. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]]<sub>[[User talk:JacobB|Shout out!]]</sub> 22:25, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | :As an admin, TK is more than qualified to judge what constitutes plagiarism, particuarly compared to a user with a dozen edits. As a former admin, I would instruct you to drop this immediately. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]]<sub>[[User talk:JacobB|Shout out!]]</sub> 22:25, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
::This is not a case where judging whether it's plagiarism is necessary: it is absolutely cut-and-dry word-for-word cut and paste, down to the missing apostrophe. I'm sure TK will agree when he returns, given the wisdom that admins possess. --[[User:LyleT|LyleT]] 22:28, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | ::This is not a case where judging whether it's plagiarism is necessary: it is absolutely cut-and-dry word-for-word cut and paste, down to the missing apostrophe. I'm sure TK will agree when he returns, given the wisdom that admins possess. --[[User:LyleT|LyleT]] 22:28, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::I'm sure he'll agree as well, it was reverted out. But in your case, LyleT, there are much better - and more respectful - ways of pointing out problems within the site. I'm sure you have wisdom enough to realize that. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:33, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:33, September 2, 2010
This page is plagiarized, there's nothing more to it. I don't understand why pointing this out is "trolling". --LyleT 22:18, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- As an admin, TK is more than qualified to judge what constitutes plagiarism, particuarly compared to a user with a dozen edits. As a former admin, I would instruct you to drop this immediately. JacobBShout out! 22:25, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- This is not a case where judging whether it's plagiarism is necessary: it is absolutely cut-and-dry word-for-word cut and paste, down to the missing apostrophe. I'm sure TK will agree when he returns, given the wisdom that admins possess. --LyleT 22:28, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- I'm sure he'll agree as well, it was reverted out. But in your case, LyleT, there are much better - and more respectful - ways of pointing out problems within the site. I'm sure you have wisdom enough to realize that. Karajou 22:33, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- This is not a case where judging whether it's plagiarism is necessary: it is absolutely cut-and-dry word-for-word cut and paste, down to the missing apostrophe. I'm sure TK will agree when he returns, given the wisdom that admins possess. --LyleT 22:28, 1 September 2010 (EDT)