Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wasilla, Alaska"
From Conservapedia
(adding link to jensen talk page) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::Thank you for your help, Karajou. I'll try to beef this page up a bit. I'm sorry if I came across as overly rude -- given my own past experience, I have very little respect for plagiarists and those who defend them. --[[User:LyleT|LyleT]] 22:35, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | ::::Thank you for your help, Karajou. I'll try to beef this page up a bit. I'm sorry if I came across as overly rude -- given my own past experience, I have very little respect for plagiarists and those who defend them. --[[User:LyleT|LyleT]] 22:35, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | Plagiarism is the taking, without attribution, for academic gain, according to none other than Professor R. J.Jensen. The site was government site, it appeared to me, and is attributed. LyleT, troll somewhere else. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:36, 1 September 2010 (EDT) | + | Plagiarism is the taking, without attribution, for academic gain, according to none other than Professor R. J.Jensen. [[User_talk:RJJensen#Post_Office]] The site was government site, it appeared to me, and is attributed. LyleT, troll somewhere else. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:36, 1 September 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 03:04, September 2, 2010
This page is plagiarized, there's nothing more to it. I don't understand why pointing this out is "trolling". --LyleT 22:18, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- As an admin, TK is more than qualified to judge what constitutes plagiarism, particuarly compared to a user with a dozen edits. As a former admin, I would instruct you to drop this immediately. JacobBShout out! 22:25, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- This is not a case where judging whether it's plagiarism is necessary: it is absolutely cut-and-dry word-for-word cut and paste, down to the missing apostrophe. I'm sure TK will agree when he returns, given the wisdom that admins possess. --LyleT 22:28, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- I'm sure he'll agree as well, it was reverted out. But in your case, LyleT, there are much better - and more respectful - ways of pointing out problems within the site. I'm sure you have wisdom enough to realize that. Karajou 22:33, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- Thank you for your help, Karajou. I'll try to beef this page up a bit. I'm sorry if I came across as overly rude -- given my own past experience, I have very little respect for plagiarists and those who defend them. --LyleT 22:35, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- I'm sure he'll agree as well, it was reverted out. But in your case, LyleT, there are much better - and more respectful - ways of pointing out problems within the site. I'm sure you have wisdom enough to realize that. Karajou 22:33, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- This is not a case where judging whether it's plagiarism is necessary: it is absolutely cut-and-dry word-for-word cut and paste, down to the missing apostrophe. I'm sure TK will agree when he returns, given the wisdom that admins possess. --LyleT 22:28, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
Plagiarism is the taking, without attribution, for academic gain, according to none other than Professor R. J.Jensen. User_talk:RJJensen#Post_Office The site was government site, it appeared to me, and is attributed. LyleT, troll somewhere else. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 22:36, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
