Changes

: As explained above, your definition is obviously unacceptable because it doesn't take into consideration the number of conservatives, and the ratio of liberals to conservatives.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 02:06, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

: As explained above, your definition is obviously unacceptable because it doesn't take into consideration the number of conservatives, and the ratio of liberals to conservatives.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 02:06, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

::I said it before ''liberal bias of the population'' doesn't mention conservatives. If you find it unacceptable, call it something that mentions ''conservatives''. If you call it simply ''liberal bias'' lots of people will be deceived, and lots of people have been deceived.  It is your hand to call it something that mentions ''conservatives''. [[User:order|Order]] 3 April, 11:20 AEST

::I said it before ''liberal bias of the population'' doesn't mention conservatives. If you find it unacceptable, call it something that mentions ''conservatives''. If you call it simply ''liberal bias'' lots of people will be deceived, and lots of people have been deceived.  It is in your hand to call it something that mentions ''conservatives''. [[User:order|Order]] 3 April, 11:20 AEST

::BTW: You didn't say before that you ''found it unacceptable'', you said that you ''didn't see a definition''. If you had said why you found the definition unacceptable, we could have had a short cut. [[User:order|Order]] 3 April, 11:20 AEST

::BTW: You didn't say before that you "found the deifinition unacceptable", you said that you "didn't see a definition". If you had said why you found the definition unacceptable, we could have had a short cut. [[User:order|Order]] 3 April, 11:20 AEST

== Re: #6 (Great Flood) ==

== Re: #6 (Great Flood) ==