Difference between revisions of "Churches of Christ"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(added some info)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Churches of Christ''' is an autonomous, non-denominational body of baptized (immersion) believers in Jesus Christ in the United States. They are not to be considered a Protestant denomination as they do not seek to reform The Catholic Church.   With roots back to 1800, it was organized early in the 20th century. It is strongest in the lower Midwest and upper South.
+
The '''Churches of Christ''' are a group of autonomous, non-denominational, churches made up of baptized (immersion) believers in Jesus Christ in the United States. They prefer not to be categorized with Protestant denominations, saying that they do not seek to reform the Catholic Church. With roots back in the early 1800s, they were organized separately from similar bodies early in the 20th century. They are strongest in the lower Midwest and upper South.
  
 
==Disciples of Christ and Church of Christ==
 
==Disciples of Christ and Church of Christ==
The break around 1900 between the [[Disciples of Christ]] and the Churches of Christ was due to much more than disagreements over the use of music in worship or over missionary societies; it was fundamentally a division between what [[Barton Stone]] called primitivism and Campbellian modernistic position. [[Alexander Campbell]] believed in progress toward the Kingdom of God and was both optimistic and not hostile toward the secular world. Stone, on the other hand, wanted a radical separation from the world, was pessimistic about the human nature and prospects for progress, and looked toward restoring the authentic primitive church. From the end of the Civil War to 1917, [[David Lipscomb]] dominated the Churches of Christ and managed to balance the views of Campbell and Stone. After his death, the Churches of Christ moved away from the [[premillennialism]] of Stone and Lipscomb and embraced Campbell's views. Foy Wallace, whose views prevailed among the Churches of Christ from the 1930s through the 1950s, led the movement away from the thought of Stone and Lipscomb.<ref> Richard T. Hughes, "The Apocalyptic Origins of Churches Of Christ and the Triumph of Modernism."  ''Religion and American Culture'' 1992 2(2): 181-214. 1052-1151 </Ref>  
+
The break around 1906 between the [[Disciples of Christ]] and the Churches of Christ was due in part to disagreements over the use of music in worship and missionary societies. More important was a fundamental division between what [[Barton Stone]] called primitivism and the Campbellian modernistic position. [[Alexander Campbell]] believed in progress toward the Kingdom of God and was both optimistic and not hostile toward the secular world. Stone, on the other hand, wanted a radical separation from the world, was pessimistic about human nature and the prospects for progress.
 +
 
 +
From the end of the Civil War to 1917, [[David Lipscomb]] dominated the Churches of Christ and managed to balance the views of Campbell and Stone who had been instrumental in launching the movement during the early 1800s. After his Lipscomb's death, the Churches of Christ moved away from the [[premillennialism]] of Stone and Lipscomb and embraced Campbell's views. Foy Wallace, whose views prevailed among the Churches of Christ from the 1930s through the 1950s, continued the movement away from the thought of Stone and Lipscomb.<ref> Richard T. Hughes, "The Apocalyptic Origins of Churches Of Christ and the Triumph of Modernism."  ''Religion and American Culture'' 1992 2(2): 181-214. 1052-1151 </Ref>
 +
 
 +
More specifically, the Disciples have evolved into a centralized denomination, whereas the Churches of Christ maintain an earlier system of fellowship between congregations which does not involve any surrender of congregational independence. In addition, the Disciples of Christ are active members of the National and World Councils of Churches and are ardently commited to social change.  The Churches of Christ tend to avoid policial controversies.
 +
 
 +
 
 
==Further reading==
 
==Further reading==
 
* Harrell, David Edwin, Jr. ''The Churches of Christ in the Twentieth Century: Homer Hailey's Personal Journey of Faith.'' (2000). 472 pp. by a leading historian
 
* Harrell, David Edwin, Jr. ''The Churches of Christ in the Twentieth Century: Homer Hailey's Personal Journey of Faith.'' (2000). 472 pp. by a leading historian

Revision as of 20:10, December 5, 2010

The Churches of Christ are a group of autonomous, non-denominational, churches made up of baptized (immersion) believers in Jesus Christ in the United States. They prefer not to be categorized with Protestant denominations, saying that they do not seek to reform the Catholic Church. With roots back in the early 1800s, they were organized separately from similar bodies early in the 20th century. They are strongest in the lower Midwest and upper South.

Disciples of Christ and Church of Christ

The break around 1906 between the Disciples of Christ and the Churches of Christ was due in part to disagreements over the use of music in worship and missionary societies. More important was a fundamental division between what Barton Stone called primitivism and the Campbellian modernistic position. Alexander Campbell believed in progress toward the Kingdom of God and was both optimistic and not hostile toward the secular world. Stone, on the other hand, wanted a radical separation from the world, was pessimistic about human nature and the prospects for progress.

From the end of the Civil War to 1917, David Lipscomb dominated the Churches of Christ and managed to balance the views of Campbell and Stone who had been instrumental in launching the movement during the early 1800s. After his Lipscomb's death, the Churches of Christ moved away from the premillennialism of Stone and Lipscomb and embraced Campbell's views. Foy Wallace, whose views prevailed among the Churches of Christ from the 1930s through the 1950s, continued the movement away from the thought of Stone and Lipscomb.[1]

More specifically, the Disciples have evolved into a centralized denomination, whereas the Churches of Christ maintain an earlier system of fellowship between congregations which does not involve any surrender of congregational independence. In addition, the Disciples of Christ are active members of the National and World Councils of Churches and are ardently commited to social change. The Churches of Christ tend to avoid policial controversies.


Further reading

  • Harrell, David Edwin, Jr. The Churches of Christ in the Twentieth Century: Homer Hailey's Personal Journey of Faith. (2000). 472 pp. by a leading historian
  • Hughes, Richard T. Reviving the Ancient Faith: The Story of Churches of Christ in America. (1996). 448 pp.
  • Williams, D. Newell. Barton Stone: A Spiritual Biography. (2000). 249 pp.

references

  1. Richard T. Hughes, "The Apocalyptic Origins of Churches Of Christ and the Triumph of Modernism." Religion and American Culture 1992 2(2): 181-214. 1052-1151