Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Length of articles (view source)
Revision as of 14:02, April 3, 2007
, 14:02, April 3, 2007{{policy proposal}}
{{policy proposal}}
Do not be liberal in your addition of the {{tl|stub}} template to articles.
Do not be liberal in your addition of the {{tl|stub}} template to articles.
Wikipedia inserts these eyesores anywhere and everywhere. If an article is short, why do we need a glaring eyesore to say that? It's obvious the article is short.
Wikipedia inserts these eyesores anywhere and everywhere. If an article is short, why do we need a glaring eyesore to say that? It's obvious the article is short.
Moreover, we like conciseness here. We're not like Wikipedia, which implicitly acts like more words is better. A short entry is often a better entry.
Moreover, we like conciseness here. We're not like Wikipedia, which implicitly acts like more words is better. A short entry is often a better entry.