Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 17:33, April 3, 2007

767 bytes added , 17:33, April 3, 2007

reply re: bias and pornography

Line 660: Line 660:

:Oh, and what people use a site for does not indicate what it is. Many people use Conservapedia for entertainment, but does that make it a comedy site? No. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 13:04, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

+

: There is a pro-pornography bias on Wikipedia, and this is correlated to a liberal bias. Liberals like unfettered pornography. What can I say. All liberal judges hold against restrictions on pornography. Look at who has attempted to post obscenity on this site in the past, despite being in clear violation of our [[rules]]. The very first example I saw on Wikipedia was a pornographic image that did not even belong on that particular content page. It was a contrivance, and reflected a pro-pornography bias.

+

: I know most liberals deny they have bias, and many liberals deny there can even be such a thing as liberal bias. But, objectively, defense of pornography does correlate to liberal beliefs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:33, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,510

edits