Difference between revisions of "Talk:New age movement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(both sides?) |
(can you elaborate, Everwill?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Not in so many words. It would be better to take a 'both sides' approach, as Wikipedia says (but often does not do). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:13, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | :Not in so many words. It would be better to take a 'both sides' approach, as Wikipedia says (but often does not do). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:13, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Everwill, do you mean because they are choosing paths other than Christ and therefore inviting a doomed afterlife? I think making a distinction and pointing a few things out might be a good idea. Of course we should avoid predicting who will be saved and who won't. [[User:Miles|Miles]] 16:09, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:09, April 3, 2007
Should this article point out why New Ager's are dopey? Everwill 06:24, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
- Not in so many words. It would be better to take a 'both sides' approach, as Wikipedia says (but often does not do). --Ed Poor 07:13, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
- Everwill, do you mean because they are choosing paths other than Christ and therefore inviting a doomed afterlife? I think making a distinction and pointing a few things out might be a good idea. Of course we should avoid predicting who will be saved and who won't. Miles 16:09, 3 April 2007 (EDT)