852
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:24, April 4, 2007
, 03:24, April 4, 2007→Item #3
:::::: For the record, I was kind of trying to parody how you just decide to define what liberalism is in terms of that which you don't agree with, in this case pornography. Unsurprisingly, you failed to catch it.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 22:00, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::: For the record, I was kind of trying to parody how you just decide to define what liberalism is in terms of that which you don't agree with, in this case pornography. Unsurprisingly, you failed to catch it.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 22:00, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::::: Those are some pretty lame definitions of conservatives. I bet I could take a random poll of self-identified conservatives on the street who wouldn't agree with the majority of your definitions. I'd consider myself more conservative than liberal and I disagree with many of the items on the list. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 23:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
If there is a bias, there is a "factual" bias, or a bias against bad science, in the mainstream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
If there is a bias, there is a "factual" bias, or a bias against bad science, in the mainstream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)