Changes

During the colonial period, each colony had its own separate government.  The colonies functioned like different countries.  There were no restrictions on travel, but if someone said the wrong thing in another colony they might end up in trouble, as many non-[[Puritans]] did in [[Massachusetts]].

During the colonial period, each colony had its own separate government.  The colonies functioned like different countries.  There were no restrictions on travel, but if someone said the wrong thing in another colony they might end up in trouble, as many non-[[Puritans]] did in [[Massachusetts]].

The only union before the [[American Revolution]] was the [[United Colonies of New England]], which existed from 1643 to 1684 in the northeast.  It consisted of a union of Massachusetts, Plymouth, [[Connecticut]] and New Haven in order to fight war and address interstate disputes.  Other than that, "disunity" existed among the colonies.

Colonies were like separate countries.  The only union among colonies before the [[American Revolution]] was the United Colonies of New England, which existed from 1643 to 1684 in the northeast.  It consisted of a union of Massachusetts, Plymouth, [[Connecticut]] and New Haven in order to fight war and address interstate disputes.  Other than that, "disunity" existed among the colonies. Here's an easy-to-use summary of each colony, in chronological order:

 

Now let's review the colonies and keep them in order:

{| class="wikitable"

{| class="wikitable"

Let's proceed now.  Upheaval occurred in England in 1688.  The people there overthrew [[King James II]], who was Catholic.  His daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange took the throne and reinstated Protestantism, and adopted the [[English Bill of Rights]].  A century later this would inspire the American Bill of Rights.

Let's proceed now.  Upheaval occurred in England in 1688.  The people there overthrew [[King James II]], who was Catholic.  His daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange took the throne and reinstated Protestantism, and adopted the [[English Bill of Rights]].  A century later this would inspire the American Bill of Rights.

In 1692, the [[Salem Witch Trials]] began in Puritan Massachusetts, in towns located north of Boston.  Several girls displayed symptoms suggesting they were possessed by the devil, and it remains a mystery to this day what caused their afflictions, or even if they were play acting.  Their puzzled doctor, after examining them, suggested that the unknown cause might be supernatural.  The community became suspicious of an Indian slave from Barbados in the Caribbean, named Tituba, who had been telling stories of voodoo and witchcraft and even fed a "witchcake" to a dog (at her master's instructions) to ward off the devil.  The girls told identical details about how the devil visited them, including seeing "witches flying through the winter mist."  Tituba first denied being a witch, but then "confessed" that she was a witch and named other townswomen (including a tavern owner) who she said were witches working with her.  Tituba declared that a tall man from Boston, perhaps Satan, visited her and sometimes appeared as a dog or a hog, asking her to do his work.  She said she had flown through the air on poles with the other witches she named, and could not obtain counseling from the minister because the devil had blocked her path.<ref>http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/salem/SAL_ACCT.HTM</ref>

 

In 1692, the [[Salem Witch Trials]] were dozens of trials conducted the town of Salem and other villages located north of Boston, Massachusetts.  Several girls displayed behavior and symptoms suggesting they were possessed by the devil, and it remains a mystery to this day what caused their afflictions, or even if they were play acting.  Their puzzled doctor, after examining them, suggested that the unknown cause might be supernatural.  The community became suspicious of an Indian slave from Barbados in the Caribbean, named Tituba, who had been telling stories of voodoo and witchcraft and even fed a "witch cake" to a dog (at her master's instructions) as a way of a causing pain to the devil and identifying his presence.   

 

The girls -- who were only 9 and 11 years old -- told identical details about how the devil visited them, including seeing "witches flying through the winter mist."  Tituba first denied being a witch, but then "confessed" that she was a witch and named other townswomen (including a tavern owner) who she said were witches working with her.  Tituba declared that a tall man from Boston, perhaps Satan, visited her and sometimes appeared as a dog or a hog, asking her to do his work.  She said she had flown through the air on poles with the other witches she named, and could not obtain counseling from the minister because the devil had blocked her path.<ref>http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/salem/SAL_ACCT.HTM</ref>

 

Before long the local jails were overflowing with witches identified by other witches who had "confessed", and trials had to be held to free up space in jail.  But trials then were primitive, allowing "spectral evidence" as a basis for convicting someone.  "Spectral evidence" is testimony by a victim that she had been visited by an image ("specter") of the accused, thereby suggesting the guilt of the accused.  Another flaw in the legal system included a lack of a defense attorney for the accused, the allowance of "touching tests" as evidence, and proof did not have to be proven "beyond reasonable doubt," as it must be today.

City authorities prosecuted the suspects (mostly older women but also some men), and nearly two dozen were convicted and executed for the crime of witchcraft (nearly all of them women, but at least one man also).  Some thought that the trials offered an unique opportunity to identify and expose the devil for the advancement of knowledge.  But others observed that killing all these people may itself the work of the devil.  Finally one of the accused witches identified the wife of the governor as being a witch.  That alarmed the governor himself, obviously, and he intervened to order the exclusion of spectral evidence and touching tests as evidence against the accused, and that proof be based on a higher standard of "clear and convincing evidence." Under these better legal standards, nearly everyone was acquitted (found "not guilty") and the governor pardoned the few who were still convicted.  Tituba herself, who sparked the panic, later recanted her "confession" but remained in jail another year until someone paid the jailer money to release her and her husband.  (Note that while a few Puritans did own slaves in early times, they did not split slave families.)  Many associated with the trials later apologized, but not the Chief Judge William Stoughton.  He always insisted that he was about to "clear the land" of witches and that the governor should not have intervened to prevent this; Stoughton subsequently became governor himself of the Massachusetts colony, showing the popularity of his position.

City authorities prosecuted the suspects (mostly older women but also some men), and nearly two dozen were convicted and executed for the crime of witchcraft.  Some thought that the trials offered an opportunity to expose the nature and ways of the devil for the advancement of knowledge.  But others observed that killing all these people may itself the work of the devil.  Finally one of the accused witches identified the wife of the governor as being a witch.  That alarmed the governor himself, obviously, and he intervened to order the exclusion of spectral evidence and touching tests as evidence against the accused, and that proof be based on a higher standard of "clear and convincing evidence." Under these better legal standards, nearly everyone was acquitted (found "not guilty") and the governor pardoned the few who were still convicted.  Tituba herself, who sparked the panic, later recanted her "confession" but remained in jail another year until a kind person paid the jailer money to release her and her husband.  (Note that while a few Puritans did own slaves in early times, they did not split slave families.) Many associated with the trials later apologized, but not the Chief Judge William Stoughton.  He always insisted that he was about to "clear the land" of witches and that the governor should not have intervened to prevent this; Stoughton subsequently became governor himself of the Massachusetts colony.

This entire episode is taught today to embarrass the [[Puritan]]s and religious authority in general.  In 1850 a classic in American literature, ''The Scarlet Letter'', described life in Puritan Boston in the 1600s and criticized its strict adherence to morality and the occasional scandals that resulted.  Yet when that public morality was abandoned, Boston and Massachusetts became the most liberal areas in the nation, and today Massachusetts is one of the very few states that allows same-sex marriage.  Morally, Massachusetts is now directly opposite to what it was in the 1600s.

This entire episode is taught today to embarrass the [[Puritan]]s and religious authority in general.  But this episode did not directly weaken [[Puritan]] authority.  Instead, it was success and prosperity that caused people to turn away from the strict Puritan life.  In 1850 a classic in American literature, The Scarlet Letter, described life in Puritan Boston in the 1600s and criticized its strict adherence to morality and the occasional scandals that resulted.  Yet when that public morality was abandoned, Boston and Massachusetts became the most liberal areas in the nation, and today Massachusetts is one of only two states to allow same-sex marriage.  Morally, Massachusetts is now directly opposite to what it was in the 1600s.

Historians continue to debate what the real motivation for the Salem Witch trials was.  There is much evidence that money, not religion, was the driving force .  Nearly all of the accusers were from poorer farms, which nearly all of the accused were from the newer, richer, commercial class (such as a tavern owner).

'''Debate:  Does the legal system or the Puritans -- or neither -- deserve blame for the Salem Witch Trials?'''

'''Debate:  Does the legal system or the Puritans -- or neither -- deserve blame for the Salem Witch Trials?'''