2,002
edits
Changes
→Abuse of sysop priviledge
** Calling liberal parties in Europe '''so-called''' ''moderate and center-right''. The is nothing '''so-called''' about heir position. This just shows lack of knowledge of European liberal parties. The worst part about it that there was a lengthy discussion on the talk page. A few editors were struggling to find a good compromise, to characterize the European situation. [[User:RobS]] just shows an enormous amount of disrespect, by disregarding the work by other editors, and the information they provide, to make it more factual.
** Calling liberal parties in Europe '''so-called''' ''moderate and center-right''. The is nothing '''so-called''' about heir position. This just shows lack of knowledge of European liberal parties. The worst part about it that there was a lengthy discussion on the talk page. A few editors were struggling to find a good compromise, to characterize the European situation. [[User:RobS]] just shows an enormous amount of disrespect, by disregarding the work by other editors, and the information they provide, to make it more factual.
::*You have a diff for this claim? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
::*You have a diff for this claim? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:::This one should do [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&diff=58158&oldid=58154] [[User:Order]] 5 April, 2:20 (AEST)
** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.
** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.
** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.
** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.